As a result of some serious family events that took place at the end of 2012, Ethereal Reader sort of fell by the wayside. I had hoped that we could do as we did last year and read and report on a Christmas novel (or two) of your choice. Didn't happen.
But 2013 is a new year, and a new start for Ethereal Reader. Here are your three choices for our next book discussion:
The Uninvited Guests, by Sadie Jones
Fallen Skies, by Philippa Gregory
The Shell Seekers, by Rosamund Pilcher
You have until this Monday, January 14, to vote by emailing me at kzmclain@comcast.net.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
I Spy
Sorry that I'm late in posting this review. I sort of lost track of time.
I recently read Winter
of the World, a very long and detailed account of World War II written as a
novel by Ken Follett. It was an extremely good book, but quite dark and
detailed in its examination of this yucky war.
But because of my recent reading of this novel, I was
somewhat apprehensive about reading Mr.
Churchill’s Secretary, though I was intrigued by its description, and the
fact that it was the first in a series. My apprehension was proven unnecessary.
Mr. Churchill’s
Secretary isn’t a comedy; however, it is a novel about one of the more
interesting facets of the war, and told through fairly light-hearted
characters. I had read and heard before about the fact that spies abounded
during WWII, and in fact there were posters posted during this period reminding
people that any Tom, Dick, or Harriet could be a spy. But this was sort of an easier demonstration of this phenomenon.
Jen texted me one night and said, “I like this book. There
are spies EVERYWHERE.” And so it was. I found myself trying to figure out who
was the spy and who wasn’t. I was convinced throughout that John was going to
end up being the spy, and was relieved when that wasn’t so. I also suspected
Chuck and the twins. Must say I never suspected Paige.
I thought this book definitely had first-bookitis. Some of
the plot themes were kind of predictable. For example, the three friends –
Paige, Sarah, and Maggie – were blonde, brunette, and redhead – kind of like a
Barbie Doll collection. Still, I gave Macneal the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps
she was going for cheesy, sort of like a Dashiell Hammett mystery. She even
featured martinis prominently in the book. And I loved all of her descriptions
of clothes and hairstyles. It gave me a strong sense of time and place.
But, I found it confusing that Maggie got her job as
Churchill’s secretary because Mrs. Tinsley got sick. Then, Mrs. Tinsley never
came back?????? She was mentioned at the end of the book, but why didn’t she get
her job back as his secretary?
I liked the presentation of Maggie as an
independent-thinking woman who was ahead of the game when it came to women’s
liberation.
It was somewhat unbelieveable to me that Maggie’s family and
friends kept the fact that her father was alive a secret for so long. Why?
Reality suspension I guess.
I also really liked the use of real characters mixed with
fictional characters. I of course liked Churchill, but I also enjoyed the
references to some of our most highly-respected people and their acceptance of
Nazism, at least initially (e.g., Joe Kennedy). It’s interesting to note that
there are two sides to most stories. While there is nothing good to say about
the Nazis as they played out, it is interesting to be reminded about the
economic conditions that made Hitler even remotely make sense to anyone.
Finally, I think it gave a good perspective about what war
looks like from different perspectives. The Irish characters were only
concerned about Ireland, and so they supported the Nazis as a way of getting to
the British, for example. War stinks, but everyone has a different perspective
about it. Still, I can’t imagine living the way people had to during the war,
never knowing when the bombs were going to drop.
A good read overall.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Fall Book Selections
I am offering three book choices for our Fall (pre-Christmas) book:
In Need of a Good Wife, by Kelly O'Connor McNees
Violets of March, by Sarah Jio
Mr. Churchill's Secretary, by Susan Elia MacNeal
Email your vote to kzmclain@comcast.net by Friday, November 3.
In Need of a Good Wife, by Kelly O'Connor McNees
Violets of March, by Sarah Jio
Mr. Churchill's Secretary, by Susan Elia MacNeal
Email your vote to kzmclain@comcast.net by Friday, November 3.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Family Love ala Brothers K
The next time I read a 600-some page book, it better have
been written by Tolstoy.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t hate long books. In fact, there
is something wholly satisfying about sitting down with a good epic novel that
has a lot of pages. I enjoyed reading,
for example, Fall of Giants, by Ken
Follett.
Understand also that I didn’t hate this book. In fact, at
times I totally loved this book. I just don’t think it needed to be 689 pages
long. I started out absolutely enchanted; I ended up skimming some of the last
chapters (or whatever you would call them) and being totally and entirely
annoyed at all of the characters at some time or another.
Well, I don’t think that’s exactly true. I loved the father
all the way through the book. I loved his devotion to his children, and his
willingness to take on his rather difficult wife at times if he felt that they
were being treated unfairly by her.
The first part of the book, as I said before, enthralled me.
I loved the entire scene where the narrator and Papa are watching the game. I
really enjoyed the sort of stream of consciousness from the narrator, who is
fairly young at this point. Through his thought process, you learn about the
characters. I thought that was a clever way for the author to help us to learn
about the family. And the language was so dead on. The author NAILED the way a
10- or 12-year-old speaks. For example, take this excerpt when he is talking
about how much he dislikes Roger Maris because of his boring style of play: I usually like watching home runs, but there
is something about Roger Maris that makes even his homers boring ……Everett says
he’s from Mars, which is why he’s named Maris, so maybe it’s a racial thing.
Whatever it is, it worries me a little, because one of the things Jesus used to
say was to love everybody the same whether they’re geeks, Yanks, Wops, Micks, Meredith
Starrs or what have you, and when I look at Roger Maris I’m not sure I’ll ever
be able to pull it off. I loved those lines because it displays the way a
kid’s mind works, particularly a kid’s confusion about Christianity, so
accurately.
I liked the succinct way that the author would get a point
across – e.g. “yak butter” (remember that Mama was the first one to talk about
yak butter when she was convinced she had experienced another life as a Tibetan)
became synonymous with odd things that make total sense once you look at it. Likewise, the disabled girl (Vera) who talked
with a strong lisp because of a cleft palate, became the poster child for doing
the right thing even if you felt uncomfortable doing it.
Surprisingly, I enjoyed all of the baseball scenes, and I’m
not even a baseball fan. But I do love to see people (real or fictitious) who
just love what they do, and I think that baseball often replicates life. Ups,
downs, ins and outs.
Real life families are not like the families we saw on
television in the 1960s. Instead, we often experience a variety of feelings
about our family members at different times. The brothers and sisters in this
book were extremely different from one another, and could be annoying or
wonderful, depending on the situation. But they were all loyal to one another,
no matter what. Oddly, even Mama was loyal, though she was often distracted by
her unrelenting alliance to her religion.
The story of Irwin was very sad. There were a number of sad
situations in this book, but that was, to me, the saddest. Yet, his story ended
in a positive way. In fact, the book ended positively (except, of course, for
the death of Papa). And again, I thought the ending was realistic. Not perfect
results for everyone, just as in real life, but general happiness and love,
which is what I think this book was all about.
Still, I think it could have been done in fewer pages!
Friday, July 27, 2012
End of the Summer Book Choices
The following book ideas are from Andrea Dunne, who posts comments as "Anonymous."
Paris in Love: A Memoir, by Eloisa James
Brothers K, by David James Duncan
Clara and Mr. Tiffany, by Susan Vreeland
City of Thieves, by David Benioff
Good Omens, by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett
A couple of these books, most notably Brothers K, are particularly long. If a lengthy book is chosen, the length of time to read will be increased. So don't let length deter you from making the choice.
Please email your choice to kzmclain@comcast.net by Tuesday, July 31.
Thanks Andrea for your great choices.
Paris in Love: A Memoir, by Eloisa James
Brothers K, by David James Duncan
Clara and Mr. Tiffany, by Susan Vreeland
City of Thieves, by David Benioff
Good Omens, by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett
A couple of these books, most notably Brothers K, are particularly long. If a lengthy book is chosen, the length of time to read will be increased. So don't let length deter you from making the choice.
Please email your choice to kzmclain@comcast.net by Tuesday, July 31.
Thanks Andrea for your great choices.
Monday, July 16, 2012
The Doc is In...
Doc,
by Mary Doria Russell, got my vote for this month’s book choice. But, once I began to read it, I thought I
might have made a mistake. After about
20 pages, I checked to make sure it was fiction, because it was reading like a
not-very-engaging biography. I was
afraid I wouldn’t finish it in time.
It’s never a good sign when I check to see how many pages I have left in
a book!
But, I ended up enjoying it quite a bit.
First of all, some little things made it readable. I thought the chapter names were clever,
although I don’t know what most of them mean in card-playing lingo, so if they
were supposed to convey something, that didn’t work for me. But, I always like it when authors name their
chapters. I also liked that she listed
the characters at the beginning, and especially that she identified the few
characters who weren’t real. I love
historical fiction, but I do like to know which characters and events are made
up.
Mostly, I liked the rather unusual way
she portrayed all these infamous characters.
Wyatt’s bad teeth had a profound effect on his personality, and I loved
that Doc took care of that problem for him.
It’s such a mundane and ordinary dilemma for the larger-than-life
characters. In fact, I liked Doc the
best when he was being a dentist. He
seemed committed to his profession as a way of helping people, not making
money. In fact, as Kate often pointed
out, his dental work didn’t come close to making a living for them. It made me feel sad for him that his health
forced him to live in a place where he wasn’t likely to be able to practice the
profession he loved. Toward the end, his
health was so frail that he couldn’t have practiced the profession in any case.
And Kate…quite an unlikeable character
for me. She had some issues for
sure. She was a different and unpleasant
person when she was drunk, which was a lot of the time. I had no problem with her being a prostitute;
women in those days truly didn’t have many options. But, she was nasty to Doc and just about
everyone else. On the other hand, she
was there for Doc in his darkest hours, so I have to give her credit for that.
One thing that disappointed me was that
Russell never showed the reader the shoot-out at the OK Corral. I guess I was supposed to remember what
happened there, but I don’t. Since she
referred to it throughout the novel, I assumed we’d experience it, and I wish
she had put it in. Now I feel like I
have to do a little research and find out what happened.
Finally, I have to talk about the
author’s digressions, two of which stood out to me. At one point, she said that had James not
talked Kate into going back to Doc, then everything would have turned out
differently. Doc would have married
Belle, they would have been happy with many children, and even Belle’s parents
would have fallen back in love because they were grandparents. Wow!
That seems a bit extreme.
But, I loved the section where she
described Fr. Alexander’s experience with the Indians, when he was taking the
place of the beloved Fr. Paul. Fr. Alex
realizes that he’s sort of like Titus was to St. Paul—always second best
because the man he was replacing was so loved and respected. Once he found his peace with that, he was a
better missionary to the Indians.
Random, but I liked it.
What did you like about the book? Did any characters or events surprise
you? What do you think of Mary Russell
as a story-teller?
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Howdy Pardners
The group selected Doc, A Novel, by Mary Doria Russell as our book choice. Discussion will begin July 15. Enjoy your early summer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)